Community at Risk: Biodefense and the Collective Search for Security by Thomas D

Description: FREE SHIPPING UK WIDE Community at Risk by Thomas D. Beamish Community at Risk examines civic response to the federal governments plans to build biodefense labs at three universities following the Anthrax attacks in 2001. Thomas D. Beamishs account affirms the importance of local political dynamics in shaping public perceptions of risk and its management. FORMAT Hardcover LANGUAGE English CONDITION Brand New Publisher Description In 2001, following the events of September 11 and the Anthrax attacks, the United States government began an aggressive campaign to secure the nation against biological catastrophe. Its agenda included building National Biocontainment Laboratories (NBLs), secure facilities intended for research on biodefense applications, at participating universities around the country. In Community at Risk, Thomas D. Beamish examines the civic response to local universities plans to develop NBLs in three communities: Roxbury, MA; Davis, CA; and Galveston, TX. At a time when the countrys anxiety over its security had peaked, reactions to the biolabs ranged from vocal public opposition to acceptance and embrace. He argues that these divergent responses can be accounted for by the civic conventions, relations, and virtues specific to each locale. Together, these elements clustered, providing a foundation for public dialogue. In contrast to conventional micro- and macro-level accounts of how risk is perceived and managed, Beamishs analysis of each case reveals the pivotal role played by meso-level contexts and political dynamics. Community at Risk provides a new framework for understanding risk disputes and their prevalence in American civic life. Author Biography Thomas D. Beamish is Associate Professor of Sociology at the University of California, Davis. He is the author of Silent Spill: The Organization of an Industrial Crisis. Table of Contents Contents and AbstractsIntroduction chapter abstractThe Introduction develops the context within which the federal governments biodefense plans emerged and on which they were justified, including 9/11, the anthrax attacks, and the successive menace presented by West Nile virus, SARS, and avian influenza and most recently Ebola. After discussing the context and moral panic that ensued over terrorism, which were used to justify the new federal biodefense agenda, the Introduction then turns to local manifestations of those plans and responses to them–the community cases whose civic responses are comparatively explored in Community at Risk. The Introduction then develops key terms and concepts that are relied on to investigate and understand the community cases as well as the research strategy deployed to gather relevant data, analyze it, and draw conclusions. The Introduction ends with a brief summary of how the book is organized by chapter.1Conceptual Footings of Risk and Governance chapter abstractChapter 1 explains the theoretical backdrop and analytical framework that organize the books analysis. The chapter begins by outlining contemporary conditions in risk society where societal relations among civil society, government, and industry have been transformed in the twenty-first-century United States. In this context, risk and its management at the individual, local, and national levels have become the predominant concerns and bases for "risk dispute." Chapter 1 also describes how previous scholarship has theorized risk management and risk perception, as well as civic and community engagement and risk dispute. The chapter ends with how Community at Risk contributes to this and related areas of research.2Risk Communication, Local Civics, and Discourse chapter abstractChapter 2 sets up the analysis pursued in subsequent chapters. It does so through a focus on the "risk communication" strategies deployed by local universities that sought to secure funding and support for their bids for an NBL. It was in those strategies that the local civic dialogue began in each civic and community context. It is in part the great similarity in risk communication strategies, coupled with variable local response, that makes comparing them so informative. Chapter 2 provides an important justification for the books comparative argument: that variation at the community level was mostly a function of local civic dynamics, not distinctive university risk communication strategies. In the context of established civics and discourse, even an issue like biodefense, while "new," was locally understood via events, experiences, and beliefs that were a priori to it, requiring an analysis of such civic dimensions to apprehend and explain local response.3Davis, California: Home Rule Civics and Biodefense chapter abstractChapter 3 empirically examines the risk dispute that erupted in Davis, California, and how the communitys style of home rule civics and discourse shaped local deliberations regarding the University of California–Daviss (UCD) biodefense plans. The chapter develops the role that Daviss civic and political history has played in generating a field of political relations and set of value claims that heavily influenced civic dynamics in town. The chapter specifically focuses on the political-cultural resources mobilized to justify local opposition in the risk dispute surrounding UCDs biodefense ambitions, while also addressing the counterclaims of those who supported the university and its plans. Chapter 3 demonstrates that the claims levied in the risk dispute emerged from a specific civic and political legacy; they were not new, although they targeted a new technology and risk management plan.4Roxbury, Massachusetts: Direct Action Civics and Biodefense chapter abstractChapter 4 relates response in Roxbury, Massachusetts—a section of Boston where a group formed in opposition to Boston Universitys bid to host an NBL. Civic partisans there invoked a direct action style of civics and discourse reflective of local civic history, ongoing civic relations, and resonant civic virtues. In this context, the NBL was regarded as an environmental injustice insofar as its placement in Roxbury reflected the political disenfranchisement of neighborhood residents based on their race and class positions. Risk acceptability and dispute therefore echoed social and political history in which de facto segregation, municipal neglect, and ongoing marginalization of the neighborhoods minority residents left them suspicious of both "white" trustee institutions and those from outside their neighborhood. Chapter 3 demonstrates that in Roxbury claims making emerged from a specific civic and political legacy where claims were not new even if the proposed NBL was.5Galveston, Texas: Managed Civics and Biodefense chapter abstractChapter 5 empirically assesses civic response in Galveston where a managed civics and discourse predominated, wherein the civically engaged mostly downplayed the risks posed by federal biodefense plans and a local NBL and, instead, emphasized its possible contributions to their islands and the nations—even the worlds—"progress." Residents expressed little of the skepticism shared in the other cases and mostly faith in the power of humankind, with the aid of enlightened leadership, scientific knowledge, technology, and economy to progressively improve and reshape their island community for the better. As with the other cases, Galvestons civically engaged relied on claims and justifications that emerged from a specific civic and political history. That legacy and the civic relations, conventions, and virtues associated with that history helped ease locals toward accepting and eventually embracing biodefense plans and an NBL as an asset to both them and their collective future on the island.Conclusion: The Civic Politics of Risk chapter abstractThe Conclusion provides a synoptic comparative account of the books findings, arguments, and conclusions. The focus is what an analysis of local civics politics lends to an understanding of risk disputes. Importantly, the Conclusion, in focusing on the civic politics of risk, shows that common political rhetoric(s) such as claims to democracy, due process, progress, and justice can mean very different things in different civic contexts that hold considerable consequence for understanding what is and is not an acceptable risk. The same terms can mean very different things given social, historical, and material legacies and the civics and discourse that locally predominate. The Conclusion also reiterates the contribution that Community at Risk makes to an impressive stock of knowledge concerning risk management, perception, and dispute, as well as civic politics, organization, and community studies. The Conclusions intervention is, however, equal parts new findings and synthesis. Review "In contrast to conventional micro- and macro-level accounts of how risk is perceived and managed, Beamishs analysis of each case reveals the pivotal role played by meso-level contexts and political dynamics. Community at Risk provides a new framework for understanding risk disputes and their prevalence in American civic life." -- Paul T. Vogel * Midwest Book Review *"Community at Risk shows how civic politics matter and shape what is locally considered to be acceptable. Beamish does a masterful job of interpreting his interviews and of providing insights into how communities confront risky plans, programs, and developments. This is an important book." -- Lee Clarke * Rutgers University and author of Acceptable Risk?, Mission Improbable, and Worst Cases *"By studying three community responses to a federal biodefense plan, Beamish gets beyond the limitations of a single methodological approach. The genius of this study is on full display throughout the volume as he skillfully takes the reader into diverse local domains. This book sheds light on the fact that public concerns about risk are far more heterogeneous than weve previously thought, while revealing how soft power motivates and constrains citizens in highly consequential ways." -- David Naguib Pellow * University of Minnesota, author of Resisting Global Toxics and co-author of The Slums of Aspen *"Beamish breaks new ground in his comparative study, moving beyond individual risk perception and static group membership and structures, to community-level analysis. His rich understanding of civic domains, discourse, relations, and virtues will help us analyze future health and environmental hazards. Community at Risk blends environmental sociology, cultural sociology, and sociology of risk in a thoughtful and fruitful way." -- Phil Brown * Northeastern University *"Communities at Risk is a very well-researched and persuasive book. It fills a niche in the study of risk management that is underexplored, and provides a nuanced accounting of how and why communities view and respond to university proposals to build NBL facilities." -- Kymberly MacNeal * H-War, H-Net Reviews * Long Description In 2001, following the events of September 11 and the Anthrax attacks, the United States government began an aggressive campaign to secure the nation against biological catastrophe. Its agenda included building National Biocontainment Laboratories (NBLs), secure facilities intended for research on biodefense applications, at participating universities around the country. In Community at Risk , Thomas D. Beamish examines the civic response to local universities plans to develop NBLs in three communities: Roxbury, MA; Davis, CA; and Galveston, TX. At a time when the countrys anxiety over its security had peaked, reactions to the biolabs ranged from vocal public opposition to acceptance and embrace. He argues that these divergent responses can be accounted for by the civic conventions, relations, and virtues specific to each locale. Together, these elements clustered, providing a foundation for public dialogue. In contrast to conventional micro- and macro-level accounts of how risk is perceived and managed, Beamishs analysis of each case reveals the pivotal role played by meso-level contexts and political dynamics. Community at Risk provides a new framework for understanding risk disputes and their prevalence in American civic life. Review Quote "In contrast to conventional micro- and macro-level accounts of how risk is perceived and managed, Beamishs analysis of each case reveals the pivotal role played by meso-level contexts and political dynamics. Community at Risk provides a new framework for understanding risk disputes and their prevalence in American civic life."--Paul T. Vogel, Midwest Book Review Details ISBN0804784426 Short Title COMMUNITY AT RISK Pages 280 Series High Reliability and Crisis Management Language English ISBN-10 0804784426 ISBN-13 9780804784429 Media Book Format Hardcover Year 2015 Publication Date 2015-05-06 Subtitle Biodefense and the Collective Search for Security Place of Publication Palo Alto Country of Publication United States UK Release Date 2015-05-06 AU Release Date 2015-05-06 NZ Release Date 2015-05-06 US Release Date 2015-05-06 Edited by Barbara Tsakirgis Birth 1958 Affiliation Yunnan Univ, China Position DESIGNER Qualifications M.D. Author Thomas D. Beamish Publisher Stanford University Press Alternative 9780804794657 DEWEY 363.325360973 Audience General Illustrations 6 tables, 2 figures, 1 illustration, 3 maps Imprint Stanford Business Books,US We've got this At The Nile, if you're looking for it, we've got it. With fast shipping, low prices, friendly service and well over a million items - you're bound to find what you want, at a price you'll love! 30 DAY RETURN POLICY No questions asked, 30 day returns! FREE DELIVERY No matter where you are in the UK, delivery is free. SECURE PAYMENT Peace of mind by paying through PayPal and eBay Buyer Protection TheNile_Item_ID:161812543;

Price: 103.74 GBP

Location: London

End Time: 2024-12-22T12:35:47.000Z

Shipping Cost: 3.69 GBP